<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Web Toolkit 2.0 brings web apps one step closer to… Silverlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://programmerpayback.com/2009/12/10/google-web-toolkit-2-0-and-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://programmerpayback.com/2009/12/10/google-web-toolkit-2-0-and-silverlight/</link>
	<description>Giving a little back to my fellow programmers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://programmerpayback.com/2009/12/10/google-web-toolkit-2-0-and-silverlight/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmerpayback.com/?p=474#comment-684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, the device(s) you&#039;re targeting is certainly a huge factor in choosing a technology to build your app in and GWT is made to target just about everything because it is just js in the end. That said, I do expect plugins like Silverlight and Flash to soon be available for any platform that reaches sufficient popularity (aside perhaps from iPhone because of Apple&#039;s closed policies).
Re: cross browser compatibility, I&#039;ve worked with both Silverlight and GWT and for cross browser compatibility concerns, you can&#039;t beat the plugin because it more or less eliminates the browser from the equation. GWT has to actually create different versions of your code for each browser that it needs to support (when applicable). This is an error prone task and will never be as good as letting a single engine (a plugin) execute your code regardless of browser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, the device(s) you&#8217;re targeting is certainly a huge factor in choosing a technology to build your app in and GWT is made to target just about everything because it is just js in the end. That said, I do expect plugins like Silverlight and Flash to soon be available for any platform that reaches sufficient popularity (aside perhaps from iPhone because of Apple&#8217;s closed policies).<br />
Re: cross browser compatibility, I&#8217;ve worked with both Silverlight and GWT and for cross browser compatibility concerns, you can&#8217;t beat the plugin because it more or less eliminates the browser from the equation. GWT has to actually create different versions of your code for each browser that it needs to support (when applicable). This is an error prone task and will never be as good as letting a single engine (a plugin) execute your code regardless of browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://programmerpayback.com/2009/12/10/google-web-toolkit-2-0-and-silverlight/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmerpayback.com/?p=474#comment-683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want true cross browser compatibliity, it to work with phones, linux, other browers then you&#039;re going to want to use javascript.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want true cross browser compatibliity, it to work with phones, linux, other browers then you&#8217;re going to want to use javascript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

